Java vs Kotlin: Key Differences and Which to Choose
Basics3 minInnovialabs editorial team
In short
Kotlin is the standard for new Android projects; on the backend both run on the JVM and interoperate fully, so the choice depends on your team, existing codebase and preferred frameworks.
The short answer
Kotlin is a modern language from JetBrains that runs on the same JVM as Java and is fully interoperable with it. Google recommends Kotlin as the primary language for Android, and new apps there are almost always written in it. On the backend, Java remains extremely common, while Kotlin is a convenient alternative you can adopt gradually.
Null safety
In Java any reference can be null, and the mistake only shows up at runtime as a NullPointerException. In Kotlin nullability is part of the type, and the compiler forces you to handle it.
// Java
String name = user.getName();
int len = name != null ? name.length() : 0;
// Kotlin
val name: String? = user.name
val len = name?.length ?: 0
A Kotlin String cannot be null; a String? can. This removes a whole class of bugs before the code even runs.
Verbosity
Kotlin is noticeably shorter. The classic example is a data model class.
// Java (record, modern syntax)
public record User(String name, int age) {}
// Kotlin
data class User(val name: String, val age: Int)
Modern Java has narrowed the gap with record, var and an improved switch. Kotlin still offers more conveniences: default parameter values, named arguments, extension functions, when and string templates.
Coroutines vs threads
- Java has traditionally relied on OS threads,
ExecutorServiceandCompletableFuture. Newer versions add virtual threads, which make blocking code cheap and scalable. - Kotlin offers coroutines: asynchronous code is written sequentially using
suspendfunctions.
suspend fun loadProfile(id: Long): Profile {
val user = api.getUser(id) // suspends without blocking a thread
val orders = api.getOrders(id)
return Profile(user, orders)
}
On Android, coroutines are the standard way to work with the network and database without blocking the UI.
Interoperability
Kotlin and Java can live in the same project: you call Java classes from Kotlin and vice versa. That means:
- you can migrate a project to Kotlin file by file;
- every Java library is available: Spring, Hibernate, Jackson and more;
- Gradle or Maven builds work for both languages.
There are caveats: Java types arrive in Kotlin as "platform types", and the compiler does not know whether they can be null. @Nullable/@NonNull annotations in Java code help.
Side-by-side comparison
| Criterion | Java | Kotlin |
|---|---|---|
| Null safety | Not in the type system | Built into the type system |
| Amount of code | More | Less |
| Async model | Threads, virtual threads | Coroutines |
| Android | Supported | Recommended language |
| Backend | Huge ecosystem | Spring, Ktor, same JVM ecosystem |
| Compile speed | Usually faster | Usually slower |
| Talent pool | Very large | Growing |
How to choose
- A new Android app: Kotlin, together with Jetpack Compose.
- An existing Android project in Java: write new modules in Kotlin and convert old code as you touch it.
- A new backend: both are good options. Kotlin brings conciseness and coroutines; Java brings a larger hiring pool and predictability.
- A large Java codebase and a Java team: do not switch for fashion; weigh the benefits against the cost of retraining.
Common mistakes
- Writing Kotlin "like Java", without
data class, null safety or extension functions. - Overusing the
!!operator, which disables the null check. - Mixing coroutines with blocking calls on the main thread.